On the actual Day of Archaeology last Friday I was with my colleagues from Leisure and Culture Dundee at one of the museum’s industrial out stores. Regardless of our curatorial specialisms – archaeology, art, social or natural history we donned our steel-toed boots and worked together with the Museum’s Registrar and Conservator to undertake a week-long audit of the storage facility. We worked across the collections, a coal –powered fish fryer a stuffed walrus, marble sculpture, a log boat and everything in between.
We unwrapped each object, checked its condition and measured it, then recorded each object’s unique accession number and location before attaching a yellow tag and photographing the object before protecting it again. This information will be added to the museum’s digital records management system. Sometimes the information will confirm what is already on the digital record, sometimes the information will enhance the existing record and sometimes an entirely new record will need to be created.
Though auditing collections is core work for any curator, is a day spent in this manner a ‘Day of Archaeology’? I was as dirty and dusty as I’d even been on a dig
Recording, measuring and data entry may not be glamorous, but documentation is vitally important to both archaeology and museum work. Those accession numbers are the object’s context – they link to the object’s biography – what it is, where it came from, who used it and how. It is as important in archaeology as in a museum that the context of the object is retained. As visually arresting as an object may be, it loses something of its intrinsic value if it no longer has context. This is the information that is shared with the public and held on to for future generations.